On 30 January 2017, ESMA issued an opinion (the “Opinion”) which discusses the extent to which different types of units or shares (“Share Classes”) of the same UCITS (or its sub-fund) can differ from one another as a result of differing approaches amongst the EU countries.
ESMA Opinion: principles for setting up share classes in UCITS funds
feel free to call us +447519645650 enquiries@cleveland-co.com
-
FCA wins case on unauthorised collective investment scheme
emma, , Our Thinking, 0
The Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) brought proceedings against Asset Land Investment plc along with its principal owner and director,...
-
UCITS V Impacts and Implementation
emma, , Our Thinking, 0
UCITS account for around 75% of all collective investments by small investors in Europe and so UCITS V will...
-
ESMA highlights ICO risks for investors and firms
Leela, , Industry News, Our Thinking, 0
The European Securities and Markets Authority (“ESMA”) has issued two warning statements on initial coin offerings (“ICOs”), one on...
-
LSE provides guidance on AIM comply or explain regime
emma, , Our Thinking, 0
The London Stock Exchange has provided guidance on the new “comply or explain against” requirements for Alternative Investment Market...
-
SPL Private Finance (PFI) IC Ltd v Arch FP LLP [2014] (Commercial Court) (Article 3 of our “Fiduciary Duties” Series)
emma, , Our Thinking, 0
The recent case of SPL Private Finance v Arch FP 2014 has served as somewhat of a reminder that...
-
Commercial contracts – key cases
emma, , Our Thinking, 0
Our key cases glance card contains practical take away points and drafting tips from some of the most notable cases of...
-
Gross Negligence in English Contract Law
emma, , Our Thinking, 0
The distinction between Negligence and Gross Negligence in English contract law has been an issue in many commercial contracts...
-
Use of Dealing Commission – Current Rules
emma, , Our Thinking, 0
Find everything you need to know about the new dealing commission rules and the impact on your commission sharing...
Categories
Jurisdictions
Why We’re Different
Through our External In-House CounselTM model we act as an extension of your team, and provide the benefits that only a diverse team of high performing specialists can deliver.
Cleveland & Co are industry pioneers, leading the way by providing the responsiveness and knowledge of your business that you would expect of your in-house legal team, combined with the scalability and broad range of expertise offered by an external law firm.
Why choose between an in-house team or external counsel when you can have the best of both?
For more information, contact us.