Criticism of the FCA’s new asset management rules has been featured in City Am. We are concerned that the cost of charges would deter new firms from entering the market.
Our views on this topic have been featured in CityAM below.
Cleveland & Co respond to FCA’s asset management market study in City AM
Related Articles
-
Interview with Legal Futures, 11 August 2015
Cleveland & Co’s authorisation by the Solicitors Regulation Authority as an alternative business structure (ABS) has not gone unnoticed:...
-
PFOF, HFT and the bigger picture
In its TR 13/14 thematic review, the FCA discussed the implications of payment for order flow on best execution...
-
ESMA updates MiFID II/MiFIR Investor Protection Q&A
On 4 April 2017, ESMA added 10 new questions and answers to its Q&A on MiFID II and MiFIR...
-
Introducing ‘pre-marketing’ into AIFMD
After the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (“MiFID II”) and Packaged Retail Investment and Insurance Products (“PRIIPs”), the...
-
Investment funds guide for 2018
Our guide highlights the key 2017 legal developments that may impact the investment funds industry in 2018, and covers...
-
Dark Liquidity – Why hide orders from the market?
Following the MiFID II conference on 18 September 2014, the FCA have expressed their pursuit towards more lit and...
-
Outcomes and remedies from the FCA’s Asset Management Market Study
The Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) has recently published a consultation paper and policy statement regarding the findings of the...
-
IOSCO recommendations for investment funds
The International Organization of Securities Commissions has published two final reports: Recommendations for liquidity risk management (“LRM”) for Collective Investment...
0 Comments
