Criticism of the FCA’s new asset management rules has been featured in City Am. We are concerned that the cost of charges would deter new firms from entering the market.
Our views on this topic have been featured in CityAM below.
Cleveland & Co respond to FCA’s asset management market study in City AM
Related Articles
-
Use of Dealing Commission – Current Rules
Find everything you need to know about the new dealing commission rules and the impact on your commission sharing...
-
Brexit update- Germany & France
Following on from our series of newsletters on Brexit updates and no deal preparation, in this newsletter we look...
-
ESMA updates MiFID II/MiFIR Investor Protection Q&A
On 4 April 2017, ESMA added 10 new questions and answers to its Q&A on MiFID II and MiFIR...
-
Conduct risks during equity fundraising process
The IOSCO has published a Consultation Report with the aim of proposing guidance to address the potential conflict of interest...
-
PFOF, HFT and the bigger picture
In its TR 13/14 thematic review, the FCA discussed the implications of payment for order flow on best execution...
-
ESMA Opinion: principles for setting up share classes in UCITS funds
On 30 January 2017, ESMA issued an opinion (the “Opinion”) which discusses the extent to which different types of...
-
Exclusion Clauses – Fraud exceptions in contracts
On 30 January 2018, the Court of Appeal provided important guidance on the interpretations of exclusion clauses in the...
-
SPL Private Finance (PFI) IC Ltd v Arch FP LLP [2014] (Commercial Court) (Article 3 of our “Fiduciary Duties” Series)
The recent case of SPL Private Finance v Arch FP 2014 has served as somewhat of a reminder that...
![SPL Private Finance (PFI) IC Ltd v Arch FP LLP [2014] (Commercial Court) (Article 3 of our](http://cleveland-co.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Screen-Shot-2015-05-13-at-16.53.14-214x300.png)
0 Comments
